CPL - Chalmers Publication Library
| Utbildning | Forskning | Styrkeområden | Om Chalmers | In English In English Ej inloggad.

Let the right ones in? Employment requirements in Swedish construction procurement

Daniella Petersen (Institutionen för teknikens ekonomi och organisation, Service management)
Gothenburg : Chalmers University of Technology, 2018.

Sweden faces problems with social exclusion and unemployment, where Swedish cities are becoming increasingly segregated, where many neighbourhoods, often built during the 1960s and 1970s, are dilapidated and in need of refurbishment. At the same time, the construction sector is facing a lack of construction workers, which hinders the large upcoming building investments planned in Sweden. In order to mitigate these issues, employment requirements – meaning procurement criteria aimed at creating employment opportunities for unemployed people – are increasingly implemented in Swedish construction procurement. Employment requirements come with an experimentation with work practices and organisational complexities, in terms of new ways of thinking, working, and collaborating. In response, this thesis aims to examine organisational implications for the construction sector, its organisations, and its individual actors, when employment requirements are increasingly implemented.

This thesis builds on a qualitative research design, where institutional theory, and in particular the practice-oriented theoretical lens of institutional work, is used. Considering the phenomenon’s novelty in practice and scarcity in research the findings in this thesis are important for both theory and practice. Firstly, a new type of actor is emerging, the “employment requirement professional”, who work with designing, implementing and spreading employment requirements and related practices. These employment requirement professionals can be characterized as institutional entrepreneurs, but currently do not enact a coherent, distinct professional role. Secondly, a wide variety of new work practices are created, which aim to support an up-and-coming institutional domain of social procurement and employment requirements. However, different approaches to implement employment requirements have not yet converged into one shared practice. Lastly, the implementation of employment requirements has spurred new ways of thinking in the construction sector, concerning what responsibilities, roles and values should be included in construction procurement, which seems to lead to ambiguity for actors working in the construction sector. As such, even though employment requirements are becoming increasingly prominent in the Swedish construction sector, there are barriers, both practical, theoretical and value-laden, that hinder the implementation, and subsequent institutionalization, of employment requirements. Having said that, when actors in the construction sector reshape exiting roles and traditional logics in the industry, for example, by using narratives, employment requirements, and social procurement, may be a full-fledged institution in the future.

Nyckelord: institutional work, employment requirements, social procurement,construction sector

Den här publikationen ingår i följande styrkeområden:

Läs mer om Chalmers styrkeområden  

Denna post skapades 2018-01-05. Senast ändrad 2018-01-12.
CPL Pubid: 500031


Läs direkt!

Lokal fulltext (fritt tillgänglig)

Institutioner (Chalmers)

Institutionen för teknikens ekonomi och organisation, Service management (2005-2016)


Building Futures
Hållbar utveckling
Sociologi (exklusive socialt arbete, socialpsykologi och socialantropologi)

Chalmers infrastruktur

Relaterade publikationer

Inkluderade delarbeten:

Employment requirements in Swedish construction procurement: Institutional perspectives


Datum: 2018-01-26
Tid: 13:15
Lokal: ’I-seminar room’, room 2456 Korsvägen, Vera Sandbergs Allé 8, Göteborg
Opponent: Andreas Diedrich, The school of Business, Economics and Law at Gothenburg University

Ingår i serie

Licentiate thesis, report - Department of Technology of Management and Economics, Chalmers University of Technology Technical report no. L2018:093