### Skapa referens, olika format (klipp och klistra)

**Harvard**

Rosell, A., Persson, G. och Wirdelius, H. (2013) *Estimating Probability of Detection Curves Related to Eddy Current Sender – Receiver Probes*.

** BibTeX **

@conference{

Rosell2013,

author={Rosell, Anders and Persson, Gert and Wirdelius, Håkan},

title={Estimating Probability of Detection Curves Related to Eddy Current Sender – Receiver Probes},

booktitle={Proceedings of the 5th European-American Workshop on Reliability of NDE},

abstract={Sender – receiver probes are commonly used in eddy current procedures for crack detection. Such probes can give a non-linear signal response as a function of the crack size. Classical methods used for analysis in probability of detection (POD) assessments require that the signal response versus crack size can be predicted with a linear relation, which also must show a constant variance of the collected data points. One approach which can be used to overcome these limitations is to use a mathematical model of the eddy current probe – flaw interaction and use this to estimate the detection probability at specific crack sizes. This method is applied within this work, using the finite element method for the eddy current signal response predictions. In order to manage a large number of calculations at several crack sizes we propose the use of a meta-model approach. A linear meta-model is created at different crack sizes and then used for POD estimation. The number of signal responses above the detection level at specific crack sizes is then used to estimate the POD, a method which does not require any particular relation between signal response and crack size. The meta-model enables a large number of stochastic computations to be carried out in order to estimate the signal response distribution for a specific crack size. We conclude that modelling is a vital part of procedure capability estimations of eddy current procedures based on sender – receiver probe characteristics and can be used for procedure understanding, improvements and aid in experimental verifications.},

year={2013},

keywords={Probability of detection, Nondestructive evaluation, Eddy current},

}

** RefWorks **

RT Conference Proceedings

SR Print

ID 185922

A1 Rosell, Anders

A1 Persson, Gert

A1 Wirdelius, Håkan

T1 Estimating Probability of Detection Curves Related to Eddy Current Sender – Receiver Probes

YR 2013

T2 Proceedings of the 5th European-American Workshop on Reliability of NDE

AB Sender – receiver probes are commonly used in eddy current procedures for crack detection. Such probes can give a non-linear signal response as a function of the crack size. Classical methods used for analysis in probability of detection (POD) assessments require that the signal response versus crack size can be predicted with a linear relation, which also must show a constant variance of the collected data points. One approach which can be used to overcome these limitations is to use a mathematical model of the eddy current probe – flaw interaction and use this to estimate the detection probability at specific crack sizes. This method is applied within this work, using the finite element method for the eddy current signal response predictions. In order to manage a large number of calculations at several crack sizes we propose the use of a meta-model approach. A linear meta-model is created at different crack sizes and then used for POD estimation. The number of signal responses above the detection level at specific crack sizes is then used to estimate the POD, a method which does not require any particular relation between signal response and crack size. The meta-model enables a large number of stochastic computations to be carried out in order to estimate the signal response distribution for a specific crack size. We conclude that modelling is a vital part of procedure capability estimations of eddy current procedures based on sender – receiver probe characteristics and can be used for procedure understanding, improvements and aid in experimental verifications.

LA eng

OL 30