CPL - Chalmers Publication Library
| Utbildning | Forskning | Styrkeområden | Om Chalmers | In English In English Ej inloggad.

Knowledge Transfer, Knowledge Sharing and Knowledge Barriers - Three Blurry Terms in KM

Dan Paulin (Institutionen för teknikens ekonomi och organisation, Operations Management) ; Kaj Suneson (Institutionen för teknikens ekonomi och organisation, Teknik och samhälle)
12th European Conference on Knowledge Management, ECKM 2011, Passau, 1 - 2 September 2011 (20488963). Vol. 2 (2011), p. 752-760.
[Konferensbidrag, refereegranskat]

In the knowledge management world there are many different terms flying around. Some are more important and frequently used than others. In this paper, we present and discuss the development and views of three terms: knowledge transfer, knowledge sharing and knowledge barriers. Knowledge transfer and knowledge sharing are sometimes used synonymously or have overlapping content. Several authors have pointed out this confusion while other authors have attempted to clarify the differences and define the terms. Knowledge barriers in themselves seem to have a more obvious content although the borders between knowledge barriers and connecting terms, such as 'barriers to knowledge sharing', seem to blur discussions and views. Our aim is to make a contribution to finding appropriate demarcations between these concepts. After reviewing Knowledge Management literature, we can state that the three terms, knowledge transfer, knowledge sharing and knowledge barriers, are somewhat blurred. For knowledge transfer and knowledge sharing, the blurriness is linked mainly to the fact that the analytical level each term is related to has come and gone and come back again. For knowledge barriers, the blurriness comes from the development of the term. The mere existence of the many different categorizations of knowledge barriers implies that the concept itself is blurry. The concept seems clear cut and focuses on knowledge although it is also broad and later sources have included much more than knowledge. This paper concludes by highlighting the effects on the terms when two different knowledge perspectives, knowledge as an object (or the K-O view) and knowledge as a subjective contextual construction (or the K-SCC view) are applied. The clarifications are supported by examples from companies in different industries (such as Cargotec and IKEA) and the public sector (police, fire brigade, ambulance and other emergency services).

Nyckelord: Knowledge barriers, Knowledge management, Knowledge sharing, Knowledge transfer

Den här publikationen ingår i följande styrkeområden:

Läs mer om Chalmers styrkeområden  

Denna post skapades 2013-01-08. Senast ändrad 2016-10-28.
CPL Pubid: 169621


Institutioner (Chalmers)

Institutionen för teknikens ekonomi och organisation, Operations Management (2006-2016)
Institutionen för teknikens ekonomi och organisation, Teknik och samhälle (2005-2016)


Informations- och kommunikationsteknik
Övrig industriell teknik och ekonomi

Chalmers infrastruktur