A comparison of Diary Method Variations for Enlightening Form Generation in the Design Process
Författare och institution:
Maral Babapour Chafi (Institutionen för produkt- och produktionsutveckling, Design and Human Factors); Björn Rehammar (Institutionen för produkt- och produktionsutveckling, Design and Human Factors); Ulrike Rahe (Institutionen för produkt- och produktionsutveckling, Design and Human Factors)
Proceedings of the Design Research Society conference 2012, Bangkok, 1-4 July 2012,
This paper presents two studies in which an empirical approach was taken to understand and explain form generation and decisions taken in the design process. In particular, the activities addressing aesthetic aspects when exteriorizing form ideas in the design process have been the focus of the present study. Diary methods were the starting point of this research for investigating the form generation process through collecting self-reflective comments from the participants. The main focus of this paper is to address potentials and limitations of the three variants of diary method used for data collection, namely, unstructured diaries, structured diaries and visual diaries. A set of method evaluation criteria was developed to compare the structure of the diary variants. By qualitative analysis of the results and comparison of the diary variants, strengths and weaknesses of each variant were identified. One of the prominent factors in the diary variants was pegged to be due to the logging delay after the occurrence of the activities.
Ämne (baseras på Högskoleverkets indelning av forskningsämnen):
TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER ->
Design Process, Form Generation Process, Research methods, Diary Research, Diary Formats.