CPL - Chalmers Publication Library
| Utbildning | Forskning | Styrkeområden | Om Chalmers | In English In English Ej inloggad.

A Comparison of the CDIO and EUR-ACE Quality Assurance Systems

Johan Malmqvist (Institutionen för produkt- och produktionsutveckling, Produktutveckling)
International Journal of Quality Assurance in Engineering and Technology Education (IJQAETE) (2155-496X). Vol. 2 (2012), 2, p. 9-22.
[Artikel, refereegranskad vetenskaplig]

The CDIO approach intends to raise the quality of engineering education programs, world-wide. Thus, CDIO includes a number of quality assurance (QA) tools such as the CDIO Standards, Syllabus and self-evaluation model. CDIO programmes are also evaluated by external standards. Therefore, a CDIO programme needs a quality assurance system that fulfils external requirements and that is able to produce the necessary evidence and documentation with minimal additional effort above and beyond the CDIO QA components. Efficient execution of this task requires understanding the similarities and differences between the CDIO and external quality assurance systems, in this case, the European Accreditation of Engineering Programmes (EUR-ACE) system. This article compares and contrasts these two QA approaches, in particular the CDIO Syllabus and the EUR-ACE programme outcomes and the CDIO Standards and EUR-ACE accreditation criteria. Also considered are he pros and cons of a continuous improvement rating scale based system and a threshold-based accreditation model.

Nyckelord: Quality assurance, CDIO, EUR-ACE, Engineering education

Den här publikationen ingår i följande styrkeområden:

Läs mer om Chalmers styrkeområden  

Denna post skapades 2012-05-05. Senast ändrad 2012-09-19.
CPL Pubid: 157348


Läs direkt!

Länk till annan sajt (kan kräva inloggning)

Institutioner (Chalmers)

Institutionen för produkt- och produktionsutveckling, Produktutveckling (2005-2017)


Övrig annan teknik

Chalmers infrastruktur