CPL - Chalmers Publication Library
| Utbildning | Forskning | Styrkeområden | Om Chalmers | In English In English Ej inloggad.

Knowledge Transfer, Knowledge Sharing and Knowledge Barriers - Three Blurry Terms in KM

Dan Paulin (Institutionen för teknikens ekonomi och organisation) ; Kaj Suneson (Institutionen för teknikens ekonomi och organisation, Teknik och samhälle)
The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management (1479-4411). Vol. 10 (2012), 1, p. 81-91.
[Artikel, refereegranskad vetenskaplig]

In the knowledge management world there are many different terms flying around. Some are more important and frequently used than others. In this paper, we present and discuss the development and views of three terms: knowledge transfer, knowledge sharing and knowledge barriers. Knowledge transfer and knowledge sharing are sometimes used synonymously or are considered to have overlapping content. Several authors have pointed out this confusion while other authors have attempted to clarify the differences and define the terms. Knowledge barriers as a term seem to have a partly more obvious content although the borders between knowledge barriers and connecting terms, such as „barriers to knowledge sharing‟, seem to blur discussions and views. The aim in this paper is to make a contribution in finding appropriate demarcations between these concepts. After reviewing some Knowledge Management literature, it seems that the three terms, knowledge transfer, knowledge sharing and knowledge barriers, are somewhat unclear and has different meanings depending on the authors views. For knowledge transfer and knowledge sharing, the blurriness is linked mainly to the fact that the analytical level each term is related to has come and gone and come back again. For knowledge barriers, the blurriness comes from the development of the term. The mere existence of the many different categorizations of knowledge barriers implies that the concept itself is blurry. The concept seems clear cut and focuses on knowledge although it is also broad and later sources have included much more than knowledge. This paper concludes by highlighting the effects on the terms when two different knowledge perspectives, knowledge as an object (or the K-O view) and knowledge as a subjective contextual construction (or the K-SCC view) are applied. The clarifications are supported by examples from companies in different industries (such as Cargotec and IKEA) and emergency services.

Nyckelord: knowledge barriers, knowledge management, knowledge sharing, knowledge transfer

Den här publikationen ingår i följande styrkeområden:

Läs mer om Chalmers styrkeområden  

Denna post skapades 2012-03-23. Senast ändrad 2013-03-07.
CPL Pubid: 156127


Läs direkt!

Länk till annan sajt (kan kräva inloggning)

Institutioner (Chalmers)

Institutionen för teknikens ekonomi och organisation
Institutionen för teknikens ekonomi och organisation, Teknik och samhälle (2005-2016)


Informations- och kommunikationsteknik
Industriell teknik och ekonomi

Chalmers infrastruktur

Relaterade publikationer

Denna publikation ingår i:

Knowledge Dissemination in Multinational Corporations